Agnus Dei Presents!

It’s happening all around us.

It’s happening in our own Church.  Indeed, even as recently as this year (see our story, entitled:  "new catholic bible ... new heresy").

It began in protest-ant-ism.  The root of which is to “protest.”

Now it continues under the guise of “ecumenism.”

It is the ongoing and culmination of the Prophecy of Simeon.

A Sword of Sorrow continues to pierce Mary’s Heart as not only do so-called “Christians” reject their Mother, but so do some so-called Catholics.

One of the most glaring examples of this fact is in Scripture.

If one rightfully believes that God cannot make a mistake, then in His Word, He certainly doesn’t change His Mind just to suit mankind.

Here is the actual Prophecy of Simeon as the one true Bible recorded it since the beginning of the Church:

                                      “And Simeon blessed them,

                                     and said to Mary, His Mother,

                                           ‘Behold, this Child

                                              is set for the fall,

                                         and for the resurrection

                                             of many in Israel,

                                                and for a sign

                                     which shall be contradicted;

                                              and thy own soul

                                            a sword shall pierce

                                         that, out of many hearts,

                                      thoughts may be revealed.’ ”

                                                                                                           Luke 2:34-35

This Bible is known as the Latin Vulgate and is the only Bible which has the right to claim that its translator has the title of Saint in front of their name.

It is also the only Bible translated by a Saint under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost.  All other translations have been done by men without inspiration, for the Holy Spirit does not make mistakes to be fixed by unholy people or “committees” later.

St. Jerome was one of the holiest men of the early Church and a biblical scholar and translator par excellence.  Indeed, his work — commissioned by the pope — has stood the test of time and God’s Will.  The Saints themselves have attested to this.  If a Catholic does not believe this, then they should ask the simple question, which Bible did the Saints read?

Let no one mistake this — including anyone in the hierarchy — there is only one official Bible of the Universal Church:  it is, always has been, and always will be St. Jerome’s translation, the Latin Vulgate, with Douay-Rheims as the authorized English translation.

In fact, the Douay-Rheims precedes the King James Version as the first English Bible, and was authorized by the Church to counter the reformation.

The New Testament translation of St. Jerome's Latin Vulgate first appeared in 1582; the Old Testament, was published in 1609, completing the work

You may read other versions, but they are not official.

Now many have "celebrated" the 400th anniversary this year of what they call the "first Authorized Version of the Scriptures in English."  But according to our simple mathematical capabilities, 1609 is a full two years before 1611 and 1582 is a bit longer as well, giving testimony to another lie of protest-ant-ism.

Most importantly, God cannot have contradictory words.  Therefore, since the Latin Vulgate is the first approved Christian Bible, it supersedes in authority all others that come after it.

In fact, one only need look at the British committee of translators of the KJV Bible to understand that many were not true Christians; some, such as John Dee, dabbled in the occult.  What kind of Scripture translator is that?

Here, now, is the same Prophecy of Simeon from the New International Version of the Bible, based on the King James:

                  “Then Simeon blessed them and said to Mary, his mother:

                       ‘This child is destined to cause the fall and rising

                of many in Israel, and to be a sign that will be spoken against,

                     so that the thoughts of many hearts might be revealed.

                             And a sword will pierce your own soul, too.’ ”

Whoa!  Time out; foul; clipping!  15-yard penalty!

How has this verse changed?

Who is the focus now that the line has been moved to another part of the prophecy that the “thoughts of many hearts might be revealed”?

The focus is no longer on Mary and that Her “own soul, a sword shall pierce that, out of many hearts, thoughts may be revealed.”

The focus, in the protest-ant version, has now been shifted to Jesus!

And why would protest-ants do that?  Because they refuse to recognize the true role of the Virgin Queen?  (Instead, protest-ants were worshiping the false "virgin queen" Elizabeth.)

We don’t know about you, but our God, the Holy Spirit, does not make such outrageous mistakes — especially for 2,000 years!

Either the focus of this verse is on Mary or on Jesus; it cannot be both!

People can claim all sorts of “mistakes” in translations and “scholarly” words, but it just doesn’t wash.  This type of error, if allowed by God, would, in effect, mean He misled His people for centuries regarding the focus of Simeon’s Prophecy.  A prophecy that is one of the most important in the Bible for it is still in full force today.

A prophecy that began with the words, “ … and the Holy Ghost was in him” [Simeon, which means “to hear” in Hebrew] Luke 2:25.

We don’t believe God works that way, changing His Mind and the scenario from one generation to the next because He allowed a "mistake" in the original translation.  Do you?

We believe someone else works that way:  he causes confusion, deception, lies, and division among God’s people.  he is Jesus and Mary’s enemy.  he wants us to ignore Mary.  he is succeeding, especially among the protest-ants.

In reality, did not Jesus warns us that the false prophets would come at the end of Church history; not in the beginning.

Was the Latin Vulgate in the beginning of Church history, while the King James "Version" and all protest-ant scripture interpretation that follows not at the end?

Unfortunately, in the name of “ecumenism,” the same evil being, who opposed Mary as testified by the Apostle John in the Book of Apocalypse, seems to be succeeding in having Mary's role ignored by many in the Catholic Church as well.

We were in St. Peter’s Square on the days of the Holy Rosary and Consecration of the 3rd Millennium to the Immaculata by John Paul II.  It was October 7th and 8th, in the Great Jubilee Year 2000.

In the Square, before and after the Mass, people were given a free printing of the Gospel of Luke (along with other Scriptures) as a remembrance of the events and a gift of God’s Word.

We are in possession of one.  It contains the Jubilee logo on it.

We were shocked.

It was another perversion of the Lord’s true Word.

It occurs in Mary’s beautiful and Spirit-inspired Magnificat.

Let us first explore the words in the Latin Vulgate:

       “ … for behold, from henceforth, all generations shall call me blessed.”

                                                                                                               Luke 1:48

Now, here is the same verse from the book, entitled "I Will Turn to the Father," handed out at St. Peter’s, noted as the “interconfessional common language translation” produced by the Central Committee (does this sound like a communist slogan?) for the Great Jubilee of the Year 2000.  Mary is now quoted as saying:

                             “From now on all people will call me happy.”

We don’t know about you, but we’re pretty sure there is a big difference between the words “blessed” and “happy.”

The first meaning of “blessed,” according to Webster’s dictionary is “worthy of being worshipped.” This must have scared the you-know-what out of protest-ants on the “Central Committee.”

But it is the second meaning of the word that is truly what is meant by the original biblical verse:  “to be held in veneration.”

For Mary IS to be held in veneration.  To be held in veneration is to be “honored above others,” especially by “position.” (This isn’t a biblical reference to Mary’s Queenship, is it?)

To be “happy”?

Webster’s says “happy” means to be “marked by good luck.” Or its secondary meaning:  “enjoying, displaying or characterized by pleasure.”

Was Mary “marked by good luck”?  Or was She just some woman who was getting a lot of “pleasure” out of God’s “happy-go-lucky” promise!

We think not.

We think — in fact, we know — She is to be venerated.

Something protest-ants are loathe to do, despite the Scriptural command to do so; and something the Church hierarchy is now waffling on in order to appease those it wishes to do business with at the local golf course.  We hope no “Church” business gets in the way of the hierarchy’s next round!

This book of heretical nonsense about Mary being “happy” has the endorsement of one Cardinal Edward Cassidy, president of the “Pontifical Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity,” as well as Cardinal Roger Etchegaray, President of the Central Committee of the Great Jubilee Year 2000.

Yes, while the pope consecrates the 3rd Millennium to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, make sure you guys do your job of downgrading Her to counteract the spiritual effects of John Paul's work.   “Ecumenism” is far more important; let us not offend protest-ants, but it's okay to offend God and His Mother!

Does this mean, as we object to this absurd translation of Mary being "happy," that we should form a “new” Church like the protest-ants constantly do?  Isn’t it amazing; every day, they have a “new” one!

No, no “new” “churches.”  But it’s time we, as believers, stand up for our God and His Mother’s rights.  The same rights that have been taught by the Universal Church and the Saints for two millennium until the heresy of ecumenism blew in.

Remember, the bishops in the last century have ignored Mary’s request three times now:  once as Our Lady of Fatima, once as Our Lady of America, and once, in ignoring the Final Marian dogma.  Oh, and they didn't also give us that nice pedophile scandal, as well?

“Let them alone:  they are blind and leaders of the blind.  And if the blind leads the blind, both fall into the pit” Matthew 15:14.

Let them alone, as the Lord commands, but let us not be blind to their shenanigans.  And let them not fool us, as they have for years, with their claim of “obedience.”

“But Peter and the Apostles answering, said:  ‘We ought to obey God rather than men!’ ” Acts of the Apostles 5:29.

The Sword of Sorrow is now piercing deeply Our Lady’s Heart from Her own children in the Church and from Her Son’s so-called “Christian” followers.  May we plead with Her Spouse, Her Father, Her Son, to remove it soon and grant Her the Triumph of Her Immaculate Heart as She prophesied at Fatima!

And as we await that great and final day, we say to anyone within or without our Church, if it is a choice of honoring you and being "obedient" to your work of dishonoring Mary, we choose instead to venerate and honor Mary.  In this, it is an easy equation:  we choose Mary over sin.

As for the Catholics in the “Central Committee,” and the rest of any protest-ants who change Scripture to rewrite God’s Word on Mary, you will not have to account to us for this heresy; but you will have to account to Him for just how deeply your ecumenical sword has pierced the soul of Christ's Queen and Mother.